Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Once again, a Merry Molochmas to you all
And now, finally, in the spirit of Glenn Beck’s immortal “The Christmas Sweater,” here is the long-awaited Tale of the Broken Hockey Stick. It’s a holiday treat just for you!
I broke this stick on October 10 of this year, during the only game I played in the A league this semester. (It’s been a rotten semester on the health-and-activity front. I know what my New Year’s Resolution is gonna be!) I promise you that the explanation for its brokenness will be deeply boring and anticlimactic (except for the part about my physical and emotional attachment to this stick), but first I need to make it clear that in 40 years of playing hockey, I have broken only three sticks. Well, OK, I didn’t play at all between 1980 and 2000, so you’d think, well, there’s twenty years during which my chances of breaking a stick would be pretty low. Except that I actually broke one of them toward the end of 1980, after I’d stopped playing for Columbia in late 1979. Yes, I’ll explain that one too. Indeed, this is really the Tale of the Three Broken Sticks.
But when I played youth hockey from 1970 to 1974, I outgrew my sticks before they could break; when I played pond hockey from 1974 to 1978 (my high school didn’t have a team), I only played a couple of times a year on the pond at Flushing’s Bowne Park. Not until the end of my freshman year did I break a stick. Here’s the back story. Settle in! This is the extra long version.
Columbia was a club team in the metro league, not an Ivy League squad, and we were a very casual kind of team. We had to buy our own ice time from the Riverdale rink in the Bronx, so we only had four scheduled practices all year (!), and our roster consisted of nine or ten regulars and three or four guys of fair-to-middling talent who showed up every now and then. We played tristate-area teams like Fairleigh Dickinson University and Manhattanville College and the New Jersey Institute of Technology, and in 1978-79, we were reasonably competitive but crazily erratic. Even as a freshman, I was a first-line right wing; that would be impressive on a less casual team, but we were a pretty motley crew, and being high on the depth chart wasn’t very difficult because the depth chart wasn’t very deep. I certainly wouldn’t have made the cut at any other Ivy League school, not having played competitive hockey for four years. But I was still pretty fast, and I still had a quick, accurate wrist shot, and I actually wound up leading the team in goals (though not in points, because I only had 11 assists to go with my 16 goals). And we were an “exciting” team, in the sense that we could go from abysmal to impressive and back within a single period. For example: in our opening game that year, we trailed Stony Brook 2-0 after two periods. During the second intermission, our coach (unpaid, of course, a former goaltender for the team) reminded us that all we needed to do was to score once in the next five to ten minutes to change the character of the game completely. We nodded, tapped each others’ shin pads, headed back onto the ice—and promptly gave up two more goals on defensive lapses. Down 4-0 with ten minutes left, we suddenly got on our collective horses and closed the gap to 4-3, and I tied it with thirty seconds left when my center dished me a beautiful neutral-zone pass and I scored on a split-the-defense-at-midice breakaway.
We muddled on like that until January, when suddenly everything changed. Which is to say, the roster changed: it was the Time of the Arrival of the Football Players. Now, Columbia’s football team back then wasn’t any more impressive than our hockey team, but the four football players we picked up in January had distinct advantages over the rest of us. Being dual-sport athletes, they weren’t our most fluid skaters, and in fact one of them boasted the nickname “Grinder.” (And thinking back on it now, I can’t believe they were allowed to play club hockey after football season was over. It was a different time, I tell you.) But goddamn, these guys were in shape. We went from a two or two-and-a-half line team whose forwards logged 25 or 30 minutes a game to a full-three-line team whose forwards logged 20 or 22 minutes a game—and now some of us had real muscles.
I don’t remember exactly what our record was when the football players joined us; I only remember that after they did, we handily beat the John Jay School of Criminal Justice and then went on our biggest road trip of the year, down to Annapolis to play Navy. Navy, as you might have heard, is a branch of the United States Armed Forces, and their hockey team practiced every day and played in a 5,000-seat rink. (Riverdale was a rink with three or four tiered benches, all of which were completely empty for our home games.) This would be our only taste of Real Big Deal Intercollegiate Competition all year, and we were psyched. And we had football players!
We came out flying, and after one period we led 3-1; I’d assisted on two of those goals. Navy was unquestionably the better team, but we exploited all three of their mistakes, and when we got back to the locker room we were feeling pretty good about ourselves. We could also hear Navy’s coach, in the adjacent locker room, screaming bloody murder at his team for losing to a bunch of dope-smoking, latte-drinking pantywaists from Columbia. OK, it was too early in the cultural matrix for “latte-drinking” to be used as an epithet. But my Moloch, what a lot of yelling was going on over there! It worked, too: Navy came out determined to crush us like bugs, and sure enough, after ten minutes we were down 4-3. And then came the highlight of my brief collegiate career.
My left wing caught me streaking across the middle of the ice in our own zone, and hit me mid-stride on exactly the kind of play on which I’d tied Stony Brook: through the neutral zone, split the D, breakaway. Except that this time, I was hauled down by a stick across the ankle as I crossed Navy’s blue line. And you know what that means: penalty shot!
Well, it’s one thing to have a penalty shot. It’s quite another to have a penalty shot as a member of a casual club squad that doesn’t have any fans at home but happens to be playing in front of 5,000 midshipmen on the road. What drama. All eyez on me!
And all eyes really were on me, too. Both teams retreated to their benches, and the arena grew eerily quiet. But when the referee gave me the nod and blew the whistle, and I picked up the puck at center ice and skated in, the place erupted—and then when the puck jumped off my stick and started rolling on end just as I came in over the blue line, the place collectively screamed, “ooooooh, you are so toast! you’re not even going to be able to deke our goalie or control your shot!” Believe me, I know that’s exactly what the crowd noise meant, because they really did yell like crazy when the puck tipped up on end, and I really couldn’t deke their goalie or control my shot. I was moving quickly, because I think forwards should challenge goaltenders on penalty shots instead of coming in leisurely-like and allowing them to get set, but now my speed was working against me: I tried twice to slap the puck flat as I came in, but to no avail, and I realized about thirty feet out that I would have to go to the goal with the puck I had, not with the puck I wanted. So I opened my stick blade and feinted like I was going to try to flip the damn thing over the goalie’s left shoulder; the goaltender went down to smother the shot; and I somehow corralled the unruly puck, slipped it over to my backhand, and snapped it over his right shoulder, off the crossbar ... and in.
Just like that, we were tied, 4-4, and I had quieted five thousand midshipmen all by myself. My team greeted me at center ice as if we’d won the Championship of the Universe. It was deeply gratifying, which is why I remember it so vividly to this day.
And we lost the game, 11-4.
But that’s not the point of the story, because it doesn’t involve any broken sticks. I’m just trying to set up the whole entire Alice’s Restaurant context here.
The point is that after our trial-by-Navy, when we showed ourselves that we could play with a real team for about half a game, we came back home and proceeded to run the metro table. We won five in a row, qualified for the playoffs, and beat our first two opponents in the single-elimination tournament. But then we had to face Nassau Community College, an institution that may not have been able to compete with Columbia in the U.S. News and World Report rankings for latte-drinking but boasted a big, fast hockey team that had gone 19-0-0 to that point in the Metro League season.
Two nights before the NCC game, a bunch of seniors showed up at my room. They had come over to smoke dope and listen to Elvis Costello’s Armed Forces—and to deliver a message.
“Michael,” said our goaltender, who resembled Shaggy from Scooby-Doo in many respects, “you’ve gotta ...” deep inhalation ... “understand. See, we’ve never even made the playoffs, dude. You don’t get it, you just got here, you don’t realize that we’re supposed to suck.” Another long toke. “I mean, seriously, like we sometimes won two or three games in an entire season.”
“Yeah, Bee-Ruby,” said my left wing, “this is basically our last fucking chance, man.”
The rest of the conversation proceeded in that vein. [Note to my children: you know I’ve spoken to you about this before. Lots of people my age smoked dope back then. The first couple of times, it really did lead to a higher plane of insight and enlightenment, and we began to listen to the amazing bass line of “Nowhere Man,” which is, like, totally contrapuntal and mindblowing even though criminally undermixed. Then we went to the Metropolitan Museum of Art and stood in front of this painting for fifteen minutes. (I later wrote a paper about it in which I claimed that it was just this far from pointillism. My professor disagreed and gave me a B minus. But I still think my point about the breakdown of color and line was pretty obvious.) After that, we slowly—too slowly, I admit—realized that marijuana eventually led not to a deeper appreciation of life and art but to Cheech and Chong movies. But what can I say? I told you we had a “casual” hockey team. In March 1979, this meant, among other things, “a hockey team whose seniors would get together to pep-talk their scoring-forward freshman while zoning out and getting high.”] And at the end of it, after everyone had stopped talking in awe of the total and complete awesomeness that is Mr. McManus’s rendition of Nick Lowe’s “(What’s So Funny ‘Bout) Peace, Love, and Understanding,” I realized two things. One, that the team’s not-football-playing seniors had actually descended upon my room to tell me how much our next game meant to them, and two, that I had scored only one goal in the seven games since that penalty-shot boo-yeah against Navy. Clearly, it was time for me to step up.
But I didn’t. Oh, I played well enough, for a freshman: I hustled to the puck, I covered my man away from the puck, I didn’t turn over the puck when I had it, and I even blocked a few shots. But I did nothing on offense. We were up 5-1 on an undefeated team, and I had had nothing to do with any of our five goals. NCC fought back and made it 5-3, but they couldn’t climb all the way back from a four-goal deficit. Our seniors (including our goalie) played an inspired game, and our football players played like the game meant the world to them, and my indifferent-but-not-incompetent play did not matter to the outcome one way or another.
And then, the next day, the football players left. Why they had to go, I don’t know, they wouldn’t say. It apparently had something to do with “spring” “break,” a concept none of us understood, since MTV had not yet been invented and Daytona Beach was still a destination for NASA astronauts out for a weekend spin. (I experienced four “spring” “breaks” from 1979 to 1982, and I always looked upon them as opportunities to pick up more work hours. Did I go “home” for “spring” “break”? Did I go on “vacation”? Please. Is the Pope an Afrocentrist?) All we knew is that we would be playing in a bizarre round-robin finals with three other teams, double-elimination style, and that we would face Queens College in the semis with all of eight hockey players.
Against Queens, our best defenseman inexplicably threw an on-ice tantrum at the end of the first period and earned himself a game misconduct, so we played the final 40 minutes with seven players. We lost decisively and embarrassingly, 8-4, and once again, I had nothing to do with any of our goals. At this point, my drought/ slump/ utter failure was Getting Inside My Head, and lest you think this is some kind of sports cliché, here’s precisely what it means for a scoring forward like me: ordinarily, one confronts a goaltender, one tries to assess his weaknesses, one dekes or shoots for the open twine. But when one is in a scoring slump, that last stage gets way too complicated. When it’s time to shoot for the upper right corner of the net, say, your scoring-slump forward sees sixteen distinct hemi-semi-quadrants, and figures (given his rotten luck of late) that the goalie will manage to nab any puck in the thirteen closest to him. Your hapless forward therefore shoots for the three most remote hemi-semi-quadrants, and ... he shoots wide. Or, even worse, he hits the post, as I did in the second period of our elimination game, down 2-1 against Fairleigh Dickinson. I picked up a rebound five feet from the net, picked my corner, thought a bit too much, narrowed it down to the three most remote hemi-semi-quadrants, and ... clang!
So this is how I broke the stick. With eight minutes left in the third period, still down 2-1, we were scrambling around FDU’s net, and from 15 feet out, I lifted a backhand over their goalie’s glove and into the net. Woo hoo! We were tied, my scoring slump was broken, we could still make the finals, and ... wha? I saw the referee at the goal line pointing to the faceoff circle to the left of the net. He should not have been pointing to the faceoff circle to the left of the net. He should have been pointing directly into the net, signifying that a goal had been scored. But lo! The puck was not in the net. The goaltender had scooped it out of the net with his glove, and was pretending, with a shit-eating smirk on his face, that he had made the save. And the ref was buying it.
Please understand this moment. It is not as if we are talking about Brett Hull’s famous no-goal in the 1999 Stanley Cup finals; and it is not as if the puck slithered across the goal line so sinuously that no one could tell whether it had cleared the line completely. There was nothing ambiguous about this goal. It hit the twine. It hit the twine hard. Everybody in the arena saw the puck hit the twine, including that goddamn goalie ... except the referee responsible for determining whether a goal had been scored. That guy, who clearly had not been watching the game at all, devoting himself instead to adjusting his toupee or checking out one of the FDU girlfriends in the stands, was now indicating that the faceoff would take place in Fairleigh Dickinson’s zone, as if their goaltender had made a legitimate save.
I had raised my stick over my head when the puck went in (you know, the way hockey players sometimes do when they score), but when I saw the referee pointing to the faceoff circle instead of signaling “goal,” I slammed it to the ice and yelled “that was in,” whereupon two things happened: the stick shattered, and the ref gave me a two-minute minor for unsportsmanlike conduct.
At which point I lost it. Everything from the past two months—the slump, the seniors’ pep talk, the departure of the football players, and now the loss of my only stick (I couldn’t afford a backup; these things were twenty dollars apiece, mind you)—came crashing down with the stick, and I proceeded to toss my gloves and helmet into the air, almost as if I were about to re-enact Michael Ontkean’s stripping scene from Slap Shot. And I cast aspersions on the referee himself, as well, uttering sundry calumnies about his immediate family members and his sexual practices. That little routine earned me a game misconduct (our second in two playoff games!), but I didn’t care, because (a) there were only eight minutes left, (b) the referees were clearly not going to allow us to score, and (c) I had no stick. And that was not all, oh no! That was not all. The rest of the team (all seven of them, plus our coach!) had erupted in protest as well, and by the time I had been ushered off the ice, we all had been given some kind of penalty. We played the rest of the game shorthanded and completely demoralized, and lost 7-1.
And that is the story of the First Broken Stick.
I eventually bought a new stick and returned to the team in the fall of 1979, but it wasn’t the same. The seniors were gone, the football players were playing football, and we had only eight players. Six of us were pretty good, and we managed to go 3-5-1 in the first half; I had 18 goals and 8 assists, and I think I was near the league lead in scoring. Then I got mononucleosis. I missed the second half of the season ... and never played collegiate hockey again, except for one game in the fall of my junior year when we played Stony Brook in the Nassau Coliseum in front of nobody and lost 16-2. I had one of our two goals.
So how did I break the second stick later that semester? Like so. It was early December, December 8 to be exact, and I had decided, during an end-of-semester study break, to clap on the headphones and give the recently-released Double Fantasy LP a good serious listen even though I thought “(Just Like) Starting Over,” “Woman,” and “Watching the Wheels” were pretty weak sauce. (“Beautiful Boy,” by contrast, is a lovely, gossamer song.) I figured I owed Mr. Lennon and Ms. Ono that much. In the middle of “I’m Losing You,” one of my friends burst into the room and shook me by the shoulder. When I took off the headphones (with some annoyance), he told me that John Lennon had been shot. “Very fucking funny,” I replied, wondering how he knew I was listening to Double Fantasy and putting the headphones back on. “No, really,” my friend insisted, “somebody shot John Lennon.” We switched off the stereo and put on the radio; within minutes we learned that John was dead, murdered by one of those evil three-named lunatics. Naturally, I took my hockey stick, lying dormant in a corner next to a bookcase, walked down the hallway to the stairs, and broke it over the banister. That helped.
And that is the story of the Second Broken Stick.
The third broken stick is the only stick I did not break in anger. A teammate sold it to me over six years ago (a $150 stick for only $100), and my first time out with it, in a B-league game on September 23, 2003 (I keep records of these things, you know), I scored five goals. It felt like everything went in. I proceeded to score about 200 more goals with the thing, and occasionally I even picked up an assist or two, usually when someone put in a rebound off my shot. (I missed almost all of the 2007-08 season, as well as the first half of the 2008-09, but played often and well in spring 2009 and hit a couple of personal milestones. A story for another time, perhaps. Ask me about the time I scored a goal just like this one, except at one-quarter the speed, in a beer league, and against a hungover defenseman.) And then on October 10, I showed up for an A game against the Blues. The team captain asked solicitously if I was in game shape, and I said I really didn’t know; I had spent six weeks doing physical therapy for my pinched nerve (you remember the pinched nerve), and I wasn’t sure I could play at all. But I contributed here and there: coming in on a 2-on-2, my left wing shot me a pass deep in the Blues’ zone; their defenseman was draped all over me, doing the stick-under-the-ribs thing, but as I headed for the net, I did the my-stick-over-your-stick-under-my-ribs thing and redirected the pass up over the goalie’s left shoulder and into the far corner. A few minutes later, I sneakily emerged from behind the Blues’ net and redirected a shot-pass just inside the post. I was old and slow and out of shape, but I had two goals.
Then, with the score 3-3, I found myself on the off wing as we cycled the puck down low. I sent a pass to a linemate in the left corner and broke for the net in an ad hoc give-and-go; he sent it back to me, and I had myself a clear shot from 10 or 12 feet out. “I’m gonna give us the lead and get myself a hat trick,” I thought as I cocked my wrists and ... my stick fell apart in my hands. It didn’t shatter, it didn’t go snap!, it just kind of ... gave up and disintegrated. No impact at all. Obviously, I had to toss the shaft (playing with a broken stick is a two-minute penalty), and head back to the bench for my backup stick (because now I can afford one of those). We eventually won 6-3, but I was sad, because I’d had that stick for longer than any other, and because it had craftily tipped in two goals just before disintegrating, and because I did not smash it to smithereens because of a lousy call or the senseless murder of a great musician. So I took the broken pieces home and photographed them, and now they are immortal, joining the infinite pixels of the Internets.
I’ve played a B game and a couple of Tuesday night Old Guys games since then, and even though I still manage to score every once in a while, it’s weird how not-right the backup stick feels. It’s like walking with your right foot in your left shoe and vice versa. So last week I stopped into Eddie’s and got myself a brand new stick for Molochmas. Can’t wait to try it out in the new year! But I will still miss the old one.
As for blogging in the new year, well, we’ll see. I’m not sure whether I should just fold this old tent (again!) and take my act to Crooked Timber full-time, or hang around a bit longer, post on an even more half-assed schedule (perhaps a hemi-semi-assed schedule), and see whether this thing blows up (again!) when the visitor meter goes past 9999999. Advice welcome, as always.
While I ponder this question, here are some white guys playing bossa nova- and mariachi-inflected songs. Nimble and melodic guitar solo in the latter, great for a cold winter’s day.
Have a very merry Molochmas and a happy new year, everyone!
Monday, December 21, 2009
Volleyball, Avatar, health care
Volleyball. So the Penn State women’s volleyball team did an incredible thing Saturday night, coming back from two sets down to defeat Texas 22-25, 20-25, 25-23, 25-21, 15-13. It was a remarkable comeback by a team that hasn’t been down 0-2 since their last loss in September 2007, and obviously isn’t used to playing under duress on every point. So although the final score suggests that it was crazy tense, it was even more remarkable point-by-point, rally-by-rally. In fact, I have to say that the entire match has to be seen to be believed—and someday I hope to see it, because I decided to DV-R the thing on my way out to a party that night, and even though I did the usual precautionary thing of adding half an hour to the two hours of taping time, I learned to my dismay and chagrin that my recording ended in the fifth set, just as the Nittany Lions tied Texas yet again, 8-8. Yep, that’s right, I got back from a party with Janet and Jamie half past midnight, put Jamie to bed around 1, sat down to watch the NCAA women’s volleyball championship, and discovered around 2:30 that I would have to go to the Internets to find out what happened in the thrilling final minutes. Mother of Moloch.
Avatar. That was Friday night. I didn’t want to go, because I’d heard all the Kewl Kidz were sneering at it and I wanted to be like them. Apparently, there are many people who will never forgive James Cameron for Titanic, and I respect that. Also, I have a thing about movies that last as long as five-set NCAA women’s volleyball matches with lots of long intense rallies. But guess what? All three of us enjoyed ourselves thoroughly. Yes, we knew that by the time we’d gotten home, we’d have to come to grips with (a) the fact that liberal Hollywood still doesn’t understand that we have to fight the giant blue Amerindian peoples over there so that we don’t have to fight them over there, and (b) the fact that it’s yet another Huck Finn Fantasy® about the saving remnant of good white people. To answer Annalee’s question, white people will probably stop making these movies when they stop imagining themselves as sympathetic anti-colonialist white people; and to answer SEK’s response to Annalee, oh no you’re not going to bring King Kong back into this, are you, except that I will admit that Jamie said, on the way out, “they were like the islanders.” I just want to warn my fellow well-meaning white folk that there’s no way out of this particular maze: one way of expiating that white guilt is to call out an anti-colonialist film’s colonialist, guilty-white-liberal logic.
So the disabled jarhead goes into the Matrix, dances with wolves, falls in love with the princess, and (as Janet says) learns to paint with all the colors of the wind. And people are complaining that they’ve seen this movie before? Good grief, people, can’t you see that you’re getting at least five or six movies for the price of one? I mean, you’ve even got some Antz in there, you’ve got Vasquez from Aliens reunited with Sigourney Weaver (hey, and some guys from the Company, too!), and you’ve got a bunch of Ursula LeGuin narratives incorporated by implication. The visuals really are stunning, and how great is it that they actually called the mineral ”unobtainium”? It’s like calling it “macguffinite ore.” Anyway, we’re planning to see Avatar again over the holidays. Just so you know.
Health Care. From this point forward, no one gets to call opponents of the Senate bill crazed ideological purists, and no one gets to call its supporters corporate sellout hacks. Everyone takes a deep breath. From what I’ve been reading over the past week, everyone and her brother agrees that single-payer would be the way to go; the differences seem to be between those who (a) think the whole thing is so compromised and Liebermanized and Nelsonized that it’s better to scrap it and start over, and (b) think that the whole thing is compromised and Liebermanized and Nelsonized but who don’t believe it’s possible to start over and get any better outcome, either in terms of politics or policy. And then there are the dire predictions from both sides, that (a) bad health care reform will demoralize the base, alienate the swing voters, and fire up the Teabaggers, giving us Speaker Cantor in 2010 and President Palin two years later, or (b) failure to treat this version of HCR as a success and insist that Republicans are the obstructionist Party of Lousy Insurance and ER Deaths will give us Speaker Boehner in 2010 and President Romney two years later.
Well, I hate to say that I was right back in 2004, but I was right back in 2004, and you didn’t listen to me. I had a thoughtful, serious suggestion for the future of the Democratic party, and if people had followed that advice then, we wouldn’t be vexed by senators like Ben Nelson, Blanche Lincoln, and Mary Landrieu now. We also wouldn’t have Coburn, Inhofe, Brownback, Roberts, Grassley, Thune, Enzi, or Barrasso on the other side. So when you procedure-wonks complain that the Senate has become “dangerously dysfunctional,” I say, where were you when we could actually have solved this problem?
Friday, December 18, 2009
Finals week Friday
I turned in my grades yesterday. For all kinds of reasons, this has been an exceptionally fun semester—the “Stranger than Fiction” senior seminar went well, and the Intro to Disability Studies in the Humanities did too. (First time I’ve taught a gen-ed course. Most edifying.) And the Penn State women’s volleyball team is now one win away from a threepeat.
So. Has anyone been talking about health care reform lately?
And while I was driving around doing lost-postponed errands, I heard a strange thing. The college radio station was playing Billy Joel’s “Uptown Girl,” to which I listened for .04 seconds, and the local classic-rock-for-bikers-and-guys-who-look-like-Aqualung station, ordinarily a Grand Funk Railroad’s “I’m Your Captain / Closer to Home” kind of place, was playing Beck’s “Loser.” I just think that’s wrong on so many levels. Thankfully, I now have that satellite radio device as well, and spent a few minutes marveling at how well this song has held up after 31 years:
As for Senator Palpatine (I.- CT), he is what we thought he was. He is what we thought he was! And we let him off the hook.
Monday, December 14, 2009
I am feeling rotten—I have a sore throat, a runny nose, and a nasty cough, and I can’t seem to stay awake for more than a few hours at a time. And of course I have to grade a stack of papers and two stacks of final exams. That is my announcement for today.
Oh, no, wait. I also managed to squeak by two considerably more accomplished and distinguished scholars to win the presidential election of the Modern Language Association. I become second veep in 2010, first veep in 2011, and president in 2012, just as the world ends.
Analysts are attributing my historic, Jesse Venturian victory to my promise, made late in the campaign, to “hunt down cultural studies programs and kill them.”
I now have to assemble a team of advisers with close ties to former Treasury secretary Robert Rubin. Are there any left?
Many thanks to everyone who voted for me! It’s
a little thoroughly hard to believe. But perhaps that makes sense in light of my campaign slogan, “change you can’t quite believe in.”
Friday, December 11, 2009
While I was grading papers
I noticed that my review of Brian Boyd’s On the Origin of Stories has been published in American Scientist. Also available in an Intertube near you! And check this out—I even got to write my very-first-ever caption for an accompanying illustration.
I’ll be back on Monday with an announcement of some kind.
Monday, December 07, 2009
Jamie checked out of the LifeLink apartment at 10 am yesterday, having done all his chores for the morning (packing, vacuuming, cleaning the kitchen and bathroom) and having collected an impressive array of achievements for the week—including but not limited to the baking of pork chops and the peeling of potatoes and the doing of laundry. We visited him three times during his stay—the first time (on Wednesday night) to see how he was doing, the second time (Thursday night) to hang out for about twenty minutes, and the third time (Saturday noon) to drop off a few items he’d requested. Every time we stopped by, we called to give him a heads-up, and he answered his cell phone for the first time; and every time we stopped by, Jamie seemed as if he’d been living there for weeks, totally comfortable and happy. Meanwhile, Janet and I went through the Five Stages in only five days:
Day 1: This is weird. This is too weird. The house seems completely empty and forlorn.
Day 2: This is weird. Dinner isn’t the same without Jamie ... hey, I have an idea—let’s go out for dinner.
Day 3: You know, we could get used to this.
Day 4: Mmmmm, we could definitely get used to this.
Day 5: When is he coming home? We miss him we miss him! Let’s go pick him up right now!!!
We’re hoping to do this again in January. But for now, we note with pleasure that when Jamie came home, he carried his (large and heavy) suitcase up to his room and put away all his clothes. Later Sunday afternoon, he and I went to play racquetball, and then the three of us went off to the Centre County Down Syndrome Society holiday party, which was much fun.
Congratulations to Jamie! We are so very proud of him. Burstingly so.
For our last temporarily-empty-nester evening on Saturday, Janet and I decided to do something romantic. So we walked through the ice and the snow to Rec Hall to see the last home game of the Penn State women’s volleyball team. Yes, that’s right, the two-time defending national champion women’s volleyball team, the team that hasn’t lost since September 15, 2007, having won 98 consecutive matches since then. Most of those wins were 3-0 sweeps: in 2007 they went 78-6 in their 26 contests after the loss to Stanford (and beat Stanford 3-2 in the revenge final, in classic sports-movie fashion), and then in 2008, as I noted last year, they went 38-0 and swept 37 of those matches for a 114-2 mark. This year, they had one close call: down 2-1 to Michigan on October 16 (losing by 24-26 and 23-25 and winning by 25-8), they rallied for 25-21 and 15-12 wins to preserve the streak. They’re now 34-0 with thirty shutouts and three 3-1 victories, which means they’ve won 102 sets and lost 5. So, let’s do the math: in those 98 consecutive wins, Penn State has won a total of 294 sets and lost 11. This has to be one of the most amazing runs any team has enjoyed in any sport since the invention of the ball, and Janet and I were happy to see one little piece of it in person. The crowd was lively and crowdy, 2800 or so, but we couldn’t help wishing that the game had sold out. Still, we got to do the wave at one point, and never having seen a crowd do the wave first at normal speed, then in exaggerated slo-mo, then at hyperspeed, we actually laughed out loud.
Oh yes, the match. We played some team that calls itself “the University of Pennsylvania” even though it is actually some snooty private school like Bryn Mawr, except with sororities. The home team was down 10-5 in the opener and rallied to take an 11-10 lead, at which point almost everyone in the building thought the entire match was over. Lo, Penn counter-rallied to take a 19-16 lead, at which point I said to Janet, “it would be a really good idea to take control of this game right now.” Thankfully, the team heeded this sage advice, and went on a 9-1 tear en route to yet another sweep. On to the regionals in Gainesville! No one has ever won three straight national championships in this sport. So, go Nittany Lions.
OK, now for a few important blog announcements. I’m working on a tight deadline for a couple of things and student papers will be arriving tomorrow, so I won’t be writing any bold new posts on departmental governance or broken hockey sticks for a week at least. And that means I won’t be able to do any last-minute blog GOTV appeals for the MLA presidential election, since voting ends this Thursday, December 10. All I can say is that neither of my opponents will bring to the office an adequate appreciation of intercollegiate women’s volleyball, and if that doesn’t seal the deal at this point, I don’t know what will. In the meantime, I can direct you to Cosma Shalizi’s response to The Left At War, which seems to me to be scrupulously fair about the book’s various strengths and weaknesses. Thanks, Cosma!