It would be irresponsible and divisive to say that Bush lied about Iraq
And that’s why I just don’t listen to people who say things like this:
In his March 17, 2003 address preparing America for the Iraq invasion, President Bush stated unequivocally that there was an Iraq-al Qaeda nexus and that there was “no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.”
In the context of what we now know the White House knew at the time, Bush was deliberately dishonest. The intelligence community repeatedly told the White House there were many deep cracks in its case for war. The president’s willingness to ignore such warnings and make these unequivocal statements proves the administration was intentionally painting a black-and-white picture when it knew the facts merited only gray at best.
That has meant severe consequences for all Americans. Financially, U.S. taxpayers have shelled out more than $166 billion for the Iraq war, and more will soon be needed. Geopolitically, our country is more isolated from allies than ever, with anti-Americanism on the rise throughout the globe.
And we are less secure. A recent U.S. Army War College report says “the invasion of Iraq was a diversion from the more narrow focus on defeating al Qaeda.” U.N. envoy Lakhdar Brahimi put it this way: “The war in Iraq was useless, it caused more problems than it solved, and it brought in terrorism.”
These statements are borne out by the facts: The International Institute of Strategic Studies in London reports al Qaeda is now 18,000 strong, with many new recruits joining as a result of the war in Iraq. Not coincidentally, the White House recently said the American homeland faces an imminent threat of a terrorist attack from a still-active al Qaeda operation in Afghanistan. Yet, the administration actually moved special forces out of Afghanistan in 2002 to prepare for an invasion of Iraq. Because of this, we face the absurd situation whereby we have no more than 20,000 troops in Afghanistan hunting down those who directly threaten us, yet have 140,000 troops in Iraqóa country that was not a serious menace before invasion.
Of course, it is those troops who have it the worst. Our men and women in uniform are bogged down in a quagmire, forced to lay down life and limb for a lie.
You all can go read the entire essay by David Sirota and Christy Harvey if you like, but be warned, it’s full of more of the same mean and spiteful stuff. As for me, I will continue to believe that the President is a good man who, as I have said before, has been grievously led astray by our unscrupulous and incompetent intelligence services.
99 out of 100 foreign policy experts agree… unfortunately, the lone dissenter is shackled to a desk, making policy and coining catch-phrases like “flypaper theory” in some underground bunker.
Posted by Norbizness on 08/05 at 11:35 AMI believe the proper response, when confronted with such slander, is to cover one’s ears and loudly repeat “la, la-la, la-la....”
Posted by on 08/05 at 12:02 PM"La, la-la, la” is good, but these days I prefer to go to Bush rallies and sing Aaron Tippin’s “Where the Stars and Stripes and Eagle and Hearty Helpings of Apple Pie and Assorted Other National Symbols Fly.”
And Norbizness, you may mock that lone dissenter, but there’s no question the flypaper theory is working.
Posted by on 08/05 at 12:44 PMOr, in the very least, the questions concerning the flypaper theory were reduced to microfilm and inadvertently shredded and firebombed by the Pentagon.
Posted by norbizness on 08/05 at 04:48 PM
Next entry: What would Jarome Iginla do?
Previous entry: Party of death